Home | Help Center

Endless possibilities in academia

ISSN: 3007-0007
Indexed in: VIP Newspaper Integration Platform, Crossref, Dimensions, Europub, Google Scholar
Editor-in-Chief: ZUI ZOU
Submit Review
Volume 2, Issue 1
Optimal design of formative evaluation method for pain diagnosis and treatment course based on post competency

Bing Liang1,#, Xiaojing Guo1,#, Zhanheng Chen2, Mi Li3,*, Yimin Yuan1,*, Zui Zou3,*


1Department of Pain Therapy, Department of Anesthesiology, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China. 

2Department of Clinical Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China. 

3Department of Anesthesiology, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China. 

#The authors contribute equally and are co-first authors. 

*The authors contribute equally.


Address correspondence to: Mi Li, Department of Anesthesiology, Naval Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200433, China. Tel: +86-18601664447. E-mail: limi@smmu.edu.cn. Yimin Yuan, Department of Pain Therapy, Department of Anesthesiology, Naval Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200433, China. Tel: +86-13564440744. E-mail: yym3535@163.com. Zui Zou, Department of Anesthesiology, Naval Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200433, China. E-mail: zouzui1980@163.com.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.61189/566435hylznl


Received September 22, 2025; Accepted January 8, 2026; Published April 1, 2026


Highlights 

● Develops a competency-based framework tailored for pain medicine education, which integrates five core dimensionsclinical knowledge, practical skills, professionalism, communication, and innovative thinkingspecifically aligned with anesthesiology undergraduates' training needs. 

● Introduces a multi-method formative assessment system utilizing tools such as Objective Structured Clinical Examination, Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise, reflective journals, and case-based evaluations to enable continuous, process-oriented, and ability-focused learning feedback. 

● Proposes a structured implementation strategy with phased roll-out and stakeholder training to facilitate the transition from traditional summative testing to dynamic, feedback-driven assessment, enhancing both teaching quality and students' clinical readiness.

Teaching Innovation |Published on: 01 April 2026

[Progress in Medical Education] 2026; 2 (1): 1-9

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61189/566435hylznl
PDF
CITE
The practice and exploration of argument-based pedagogy through academic controversy in an eight-year medical immunology program: A case study of the

Liyuan Zhao1, Yijie Tao2, Min Zhang3, Sheng Xu1 


1National Key Laboratory of Immunology & Inflammation, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China. 

2Department of Physiology of Anesthesia, School of Anesthesiology, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China. 

3Department of Laboratory Animal Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.


Address correspondence to: Sheng Xu, National Key Laboratory of Immunology & Inflammation, Naval Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200433, China. Tel: +86-13564932474. E-mail: x.xusheng@163.com. Min Zhang, Department of Laboratory Animal Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Naval Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200433, China. Tel: +86-18764201333. E-mail: zhangmin_vet@126.com.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.61189/466869iuwenb


Received October 28, 2025; Accepted December 4, 2025; Published April 1, 2026


Highlights 

● A single two-hour, debate-based seminar embedded within an eight-year medical immunology curriculum significantly improved students' critical thinking (Cohen' s d=2.3) and ethical sensitivity. 

● Utilizing the high-profile "Liping Chen–PD-1/PD-L1 Nobel priority controversy" as a structured academic controversy (SAC) case enabled students to master key immuno-oncology concepts without requiring additional curricular time. 

● The scalable SAC model provides an efficient, evidence-based pathway to cultivate ethically-minded physician-scientists within the constraints of crowded medical curricula.

Research Article |Published on: 01 April 2026

[Progress in Medical Education] 2026; 2 (1): 10-15

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61189/466869iuwenb
PDF
CITE
Comprehensive pathways and strategies for reforming laboratory animal science education

Min Zhang1, Yijie Tao2, Sheng Xu3, Liyuan Zhao3, Shufang Cui1


1Department of Laboratory Animal Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China. 

2Department of Physiology for Anesthesia, School of Anesthesiology, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China. 

3National Key Laboratory of Immunity & Inflammation, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.


Address correspondence to: Shufang Cui, Department of Laboratory Animal Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Naval Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200433, China. E-mail: youngstar_sf@163.com. Liyuan Zhao, National Key Laboratory of Immunity & Inflammation, Naval Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200433, China. E-mail: liyuanzhao035@foxmail.com.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.61189/463023earkce


Received October 29, 2025; Accepted November 25, 2025; Published April 1, 2026


Highlights 

● Proposes a "trinity" reform framework: a framework that centered on animal welfare ethics, supported by virtual simulation technology, and driven by innovations in management and assessment systems. 

● Enhances teaching reform and professional development: to improve the effectiveness of teaching and to cultivate future professionals in life sciences who are innovative, practical, and ethically responsible. 

● Provides a comprehensive solution for curriculum reform: to provide a forward-looking, implementable solution for comprehensive curriculum reform of laboratory animal science in higher education institutions.

Teaching Innovation |Published on: 01 April 2026

[Progress in Medical Education] 2026; 2 (1): 16-22.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61189/463023earkce
PDF
CITE