Home | Help Center

Endless possibilities in academia

Rapid anesthesia assessment and clinical emergency management in emergency surgery

Songxiao Yang1, Ping Zhou2 


1Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570100, Hainan, China.

2Radiotherapy Department II, Key Laboratory of Emergency and Trauma of Ministry of Education, The First Affiliated Hospital, The First Clinical College, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570100, Hainan, China.


Address correspondence to: Ping Zhou, Radiotherapy Department II, Key Laboratory of Emergency and Trauma of Ministry of Education, The First Affiliated Hospital, The First Clinical College, Hainan Medical University, No. 31 Longhua Road, Xinhua District, Haikou 570100, Hainan, China. E-mail: ping.zhou@muhn.edu.cn.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.61189/891717grkkpo


Received December 21, 2025; Accepted March 13, 2026; Published March 31, 2026 

Abstract

Emergency surgery anesthesia is performed in an extremely time-critical and high-risk setting, where delayed or inaccurate assessment may lead to severe perioperative complications. Patients often present with hemodynamic instability, limited preoperative information, and complex comorbidities, creating major challenges for anesthesiologists to rapidly evaluate airway, circulation, and physiological reserve. Although multiple assessment tools exist, conventional approaches remain fragmented and insufficient for dynamic, real-time decision-making in emergency contexts. There is a clear need for an integrated rapid anesthesia assessment framework that combines advanced monitoring, intelligent decision support, and team-based coordination. This perspective article systematically analyzes rapid assessment models that integrate multimodal point-of-care ultrasound, artificial intelligence–assisted regulation, and closed-loop clinical decision support system (CDSS) protocols. Key applications in perioperative airway management, hemodynamic and respiratory assessment, and risk stratification for special populations, including elderly and pediatric patients, are discussed. We further summarize the rapid titration and hemodynamic advantages of novel anesthetic agents in emergency induction, the role of CDSS and closed-loop communication in clinical emergency management, and the optimization of team collaboration using standardized tools such as Situation–Background–Assessment–Recommendation. Ethical and legal considerations, including informed consent, presumed consent, and proxy decision-making in time-sensitive scenarios, are also addressed. Overall, integrated rapid assessment strategies supported by technology, interdisciplinary teamwork, and ethical safeguards may substantially enhance the safety, efficiency, and clinical outcomes of anesthesia management in emergency surgery, providing a practical framework for future perioperative practice and multicenter validation.

Keywords: Emergency surgery anesthesia, Rapid assessment, Clinical emergency management, Point-of-care ultrasound, Decision support systems, Team collaboration

Supplementary Material

Cite

Yang SX, Zhou P. Rapid anesthesia assessment and clinical emergency management in emergency surgery. Perioper Precis Med. 2026 Mar; 4 (1): 62-66. doi: 10.61189/891717grkkpo

[Copy]