Review
Open Access

Agentic health systems: from smart hospitals to continuously coordinated care

Deng Siyu
Deng Siyu
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
,
Ge Haiyan
Ge Haiyan
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
,
Bai Chunxue
Bai Chunxue
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; AI+Lung Cancer Prevention and Treatment Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Respiratory Internet of Things Medical Engineering Technology Research Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Shanghai 200032, China.
Author information
Article notes
Funding
Deng Siyu, Master's student, E-mail: dengsiyu021012@163.com
Corresponding author, Bai Chunxue, MD, Chief Physician and Professor, E-mail: cxbai@fudan.edu.cn
Received July 27, 2026; Accepted September 2, 2026; Published September 25, 2026
Supported by the Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project (2024ZD0529300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82570143 and 82170110), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (20DZ2254400, 21DZ2200600, and 20DZ2261200), the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (ZD2021CY001), and the Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty (shslczdzk02201).
Review
Open Access
Agentic health systems: from smart hospitals to continuously coordinated care
Deng Siyu
Deng Siyu
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
,
Ge Haiyan
Ge Haiyan
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
,
Bai Chunxue
Bai Chunxue
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; AI+Lung Cancer Prevention and Treatment Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Respiratory Internet of Things Medical Engineering Technology Research Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Shanghai 200032, China.
Author information
Deng Siyu, Master's student, E-mail: dengsiyu021012@163.com
Corresponding author, Bai Chunxue, MD, Chief Physician and Professor, E-mail: cxbai@fudan.edu.cn
Article notes
Received July 27, 2026; Accepted September 2, 2026; Published September 25, 2026
Funding
Supported by the Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project (2024ZD0529300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82570143 and 82170110), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (20DZ2254400, 21DZ2200600, and 20DZ2261200), the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (ZD2021CY001), and the Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty (shslczdzk02201).
PDF
On This Page
CITE
Accesses: 66

Abstract

Medical artificial intelligence is evolving from single-task prediction models and generative assistants into agents capable of perceiving the environment, decomposing goals, invoking tools, coordinating resources, and tracking outcomes. However, a leap in capability does not equate to a leap in clinical authorization. Existing evidence comes mainly from retrospective data and simulated cases, while real-world, multicenter studies with patient outcomes as endpoints remain scarce. If autonomy is pursued without boundaries, accountability, and operational monitoring, agents may amplify a single model error into continuous harm across processes and institutions. This paper proposes the agentic health system (AHS) framework: under the premises of a clearly defined intended use, action authority, accountable entities, and failure fallback, agents execute a “perceive–prioritize–coordinate–act–learn” loop around patient goals, connecting the three domains of hospital, home, and public health, and shifting healthcare from fragmented services to continuous coordination. This paper further proposes four levels of action authority, a minimum implementation unit, a four-stage translation pathway, two anchor endpoints—system safety and system benefit—and the SCORE evaluation framework. The maturity criterion for AHS is not the number of automated tasks, but whether appropriate care can be delivered at the appropriate time, in the appropriate place, and under appropriate supervision, while improving safety, continuity, operational value, resilience, and equity. The endpoint of hospital agents should not be the “unmanned hospital,” but rather a supervised autonomous healthcare system that is professional-led, patient-engaged, machine-auditable, and accountability-traceable.


Key Words: hospital agents; agentic health system; supervised autonomy; smart hospital; hospital at home; continuous care
Metaverse in Medicine

ISSN: 3006-4236

Volume 3, Issue 3

September 2026

Pages: 147-242

PDF CITE Accesses: 66
Metaverse in Medicine
ISSN: 3006-4236
ZENTIME PUBLISHING CORPORATION LIMITED
On This Page
CITE
On This Page
Abstract