随着元宇宙医学的研究和应用，制定其相关的共识指南也被推上日程。但是，由于元宇宙医学是一新生事物，必须兼顾其特殊性，才能制定兼具创新性、科学性、实用性和惠众性的共识指南。为此，要达到这一目标，需要考虑以下几个方面，（1）跨学科融合：元宇宙医学本身是医学与信息技术、人工智能（artificial intelligence，AI）等多个学科的交叉融合产物，因此，在制定元宇宙医学共识指南过程中需要吸收多学科专家的意见和建议，确保其全面性和专业性。这种跨学科融合的特点使得共识指南在内容上具有独特性和复杂性。（2）技术创新性：元宇宙医学关注的核心技术，如虚拟现实（VR）、增强现实（AR）、混合现实（MR）和拓展现实（XR），都是近年快速发展的创新技术，目前在医学领域的应用尚处于探索阶段。因此共识指南需要关注最新技术动态，为相关研究和实践提供前沿指导。（3）应用场景多样性：元宇宙医学涉及的应用场景非常广泛，包括医学教育、预防保健、临床诊断、治疗干预和康复管理等各个环节，这使得共识指南在编制过程中需要考虑不同场景下的实际需求和技术挑战，提供针对性的解决方案和建议。（4）法规伦理要求：由于元宇宙医学涉及患者隐私和数据安全等敏感问题，因此在制定共识指南时需要充分考虑相关法规伦理要求，明确数据收集、处理、存储和传输等环节的合规性要求，保障患者隐私和数据安全。综上，元宇宙医学共识指南的特殊性主要体现在跨学科融合、技术创新性、应用场景多样性和法规伦理要求等方面。这些特殊性使得在编制过程中需要更加谨慎和全面，以确保其科学性和实用性。

Along with the research and application of metaverse in medicine, the development of consensus and guidelines has also been pushed to the agenda. However, since metaverse in medicine is a new thing, it is necessary to consider its particularity to formulate consensus and guidelines that are innovative, scientific, practical, and beneficial to the public. To achieve this, the following aspects need to be considered, (1) interdisciplinary integration: metaverse in medicine is a product of the cross-integration of medicine, information technology, artificial intelligence and other disciplines. Therefore, in the process of formulating consensus and guidelines for metaverse in medicine, it is necessary to absorb the opinions and suggestions of multidisciplinary experts to ensure their comprehensiveness and professionalism. This interdisciplinary integration makes the consensus and guidelines unique and complex in content.  (2) Technological innovation: the core technologies that the metaverse in medicine focus on, such as virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR), and extended reality (XR), are all innovative technologies that have developed rapidly in recent years, and their applications in the medical field are still in the exploratory stage. Therefore, consensus and guidelines need to pay attention to the latest technological trends and provide cutting-edge guidance for related research and practice. (3) Diversity of application scenarios: the metaverse in medicine covers a wide range of application scenarios, including medical education, preventive health care, clinical diagnosis, treatment intervention, and rehabilitation management, which makes it necessary to consider the actual needs and technical challenges in different scenarios in the process of compiling the consensus and guidelines, and provide targeted solutions and suggestions. (4) Regulatory and ethical requirements: since metaverse in medicine involves sensitive issues such as patient privacy and data security, it is necessary to fully consider the ethical requirements of relevant regulations when formulating consensus and guidelines. Consensus and guidelines need to clarify compliance requirements for data collection, processing, storage, and transmission to ensure patient privacy and data security. To sum up, the particularity of the consensus and guildlines for metaverse in medicine is mainly reflected in interdisciplinary integration, technological innovation, diversity of application scenarios, and regulatory and ethical requirements. These particularities make it necessary to be more cautious and comprehensive in the compilation process to ensure its scientific and practical nature.